Michel de Montaigne ("Of Cannibals")

Swift satiric entirelyy suggests feeding babies in order to reduce the population. The bureaucratic attitude of the generator also reflects the modern era's tendency to deal with problems in an annul way, so that the horrible suffering which would accompany Swift's "modest purpose" is non taken into serious consideration. Man's in kindity to man, then and now, is accentuate in such a bureaucratic, "logical" solution to the problem of overpopulation.

In "Of Cannibals," Montaigne, not writing satirically iodine fears, analyzes spirit and death in a society of cannibals and concludes that these human-eating fellows are not evil entities with no sense of their own or others' humanity, only when instead are people who should be confabulaten as examples of the purest forge of society. Montaigne compares his own society with that of the cannibals, and finds his own wanting in that similitude. He sets aside their cannibalism, as well as the fact that they first base gain their meal-to-be with s manner of speaking, and finds that no modern human could ever hope to live up to their high standards of behavior: "The very words that signify lying, treachery, dissimulation, avarice, envy, belittling, pardon--unheard of. How far from this perfection would [Plato] find the republic that he imagined" (Montaigne 153).

With such a claim, assuming that Montaigne is writing seriously and sincerely, and not ironically as Swift writes, Mo

Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Es affirms of Montaigne. Stanford: Stanford U P, 1958.

One wonders if Swift's satirical persona and Montaigne would tang the same way about eating human beings if they had in front of them bowlsful of human flesh. It is easy for Montaigne to sit in his speculate far from the cannibals' society and wax romantic about their marvelously pure lifestyle. It would not be so easy to see the cannibals' way of life as this romantic and pure if he were sitting down around their campfire and sharing their human meal, and it would be even more difficult were they in the midst of preparing to murder and eat him.

Swift, Jonathan. "A Modest Proposal." The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M.H. Abrams. New York: Norton, 1974. 2094-2101.

Hobbes puts the Leviathan in a higher position than even God in terms of political affairs, arguing that if the Leviathan makes a handsome integrity, it is not the indemnify of the people to protest or defy that law (for they have given up such a right when they agreed to the social contract with the Leviathan). Such a bad law will result in God's ultimate sentiment on the Leviathan, but the people have no say in the matter.

ntaigne reflects the modern tendency to look at the human beings and see what one wishes to see, selectively editing out what one does not want to see. His argument also reflects the tendency of umteen individuals to romanticize a foreign culture in comparison with one's own, especially if the foreign culture is exotic, which the cannibals' culture certainly is.

Hobbes, in Leviathan, paints a negative view of the nature of human beings and a belief in the necessity of a world-beaterful judicature in order to control the violent self-centeredness of human beings. Hobbes' philosophy seeks to ensure civil order above all other considerations, which means for him the absolute power of the government, or the Leviathan, which power the people have given him through the social contract. Hobbes' views of huma
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.